457.From Billion-Dollar Marriages to Clean Datasets: The Art of SAS Standardization

Billion-Dollar Weddings & Broken Data: Mastering Data Standardization in SAS with Real-World Chaos

1. Introduction – When Glamour Meets Garbage Data

Imagine you're working as a SAS programmer in a global analytics firm. Your manager assigns you a dataset titled “Costly Marriages in the World” high-profile weddings involving celebrities, business tycoons, and royal families. The goal? Generate insights on spending patterns, country-wise trends, and luxury benchmarks.

You open the dataset expecting elegance… but what you get is chaos.

  • Marriage costs entered as "5M", "5000000", and "5 million"
  • Dates like "2023-02-30" (which doesn’t even exist)
  • Country names: "india", "IND", "India "
  • Duplicate billionaire weddings (because apparently one wasn’t enough )
  • Negative guest counts (time travelers?)

This is not just messy it’s dangerous.

In real-world analytics, especially in clinical trials (SDTM/ADaM) or financial reporting, bad data leads to:

  • Incorrect conclusions
  • Regulatory rejection
  • Business loss

This is where data standardization becomes mission-critical.

Tools like SAS and R are industry powerhouses for cleaning and transforming such messy datasets into structured, reliable formats.

Let’s walk through a step-by-step, real-world implementation using both SAS and R.

2. Raw Data Creation in SAS and R (With Intentional Errors)

SAS Raw Dataset

DATA costly_marriages_raw;

INFILE DATALINES DSD DLM=',' TRUNCOVER;

INPUT ID Name:$20. Country:$15. Cost:$15. Guests Age Marriage_Date:$15.

       Status:$10. Sponsor:$20.;

DATALINES;

1,RoyalWedding,india,5000000,2000,30,2023-02-28,Done,KingCorp

2,EliteUnion,USA,5M,1500,-25,2023-02-30,done,QueenLtd

3,LuxuryTie,UK,NULL,1800,40,2022/12/15,Completed,NULL

4,GrandAffair,India,7000000,,35,15-01-2023,Done,KingCorp

5,RoyalWedding,india,5000000,2000,30,2023-02-28,Done,KingCorp

6,DiamondBond,FRANCE,-8000000,2500,45,2023-03-10,Done,EliteGroup

7,GoldenCeremony,USA,9000000,3000,50,2023-04-12,,GoldInc

8,PlatinumUnion,UK,10000000,3500,60,2023-05-20,Done,

9,SilverKnot,IND,8500000,2800,55,2023-06-15,done,SilverCorp

10,EliteUnion,USA,5M,1500,-25,2023-02-30,done,QueenLtd

;

RUN;

PROC PRINT DATA = costly_marriages_raw;

RUN;

OUTPUT:

ObsIDNameCountryCostGuestsAgeMarriage_DateStatusSponsor
11RoyalWeddingindia50000002000302023-02-28DoneKingCorp
22EliteUnionUSA5M1500-252023-02-30doneQueenLtd
33LuxuryTieUKNULL1800402022/12/15CompletedNULL
44GrandAffairIndia7000000.3515-01-2023DoneKingCorp
55RoyalWeddingindia50000002000302023-02-28DoneKingCorp
66DiamondBondFRANCE-80000002500452023-03-10DoneEliteGroup
77GoldenCeremonyUSA90000003000502023-04-12 GoldInc
88PlatinumUnionUK100000003500602023-05-20Done 
99SilverKnotIND85000002800552023-06-15doneSilverCorp
1010EliteUnionUSA5M1500-252023-02-30doneQueenLtd

R Code – Equivalent Raw Dataset

costly_marriages_raw <- data.frame(

  ID = c(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10),

  Name = c("RoyalWedding","EliteUnion","LuxuryTie","GrandAffair",

           "RoyalWedding","DiamondBond","GoldenCeremony","PlatinumUnion",

           "SilverKnot","EliteUnion"),

  Country = c("india","USA","UK","India","india","FRANCE","USA",

              "UK","IND","USA"),

  Cost = c("5000000","5M","NULL","7000000","5000000","-8000000",

           "9000000","10000000","8500000","5M"),

  Guests = c(2000,1500,1800,NA,2000,2500,3000,3500,2800,1500),

  Age = c(30,-25,40,35,30,45,50,60,55,-25),

  Marriage_Date = c("2023-02-28","2023-02-30","2022/12/15",

                    "15-01-2023","2023-02-28","2023-03-10",

                    "2023-04-12","2023-05-20","2023-06-15",

                    "2023-02-30"),

  Status = c("Done","done","Completed","Done","Done","Done","",

             "Done","done","done"),

  Sponsor = c("KingCorp","QueenLtd",NA,"KingCorp","KingCorp",

              "EliteGroup","GoldInc",NA,"SilverCorp","QueenLtd")

)

OUTPUT:

 

ID

Name

Country

Cost

Guests

Age

Marriage_Date

Status

Sponsor

1

1

RoyalWedding

india

5000000

2000

30

28-02-2023

Done

KingCorp

2

2

EliteUnion

USA

5M

1500

-25

2023-02-30

done

QueenLtd

3

3

LuxuryTie

UK

NULL

1800

40

15-12-2022

Completed

NA

4

4

GrandAffair

India

7000000

NA

35

15-01-2023

Done

KingCorp

5

5

RoyalWedding

india

5000000

2000

30

28-02-2023

Done

KingCorp

6

6

DiamondBond

FRANCE

-8000000

2500

45

10-03-2023

Done

EliteGroup

7

7

GoldenCeremony

USA

9000000

3000

50

12-04-2023

 

GoldInc

8

8

PlatinumUnion

UK

10000000

3500

60

20-05-2023

Done

NA

9

9

SilverKnot

IND

8500000

2800

55

15-06-2023

done

SilverCorp

10

10

EliteUnion

USA

5M

1500

-25

2023-02-30

done

QueenLtd

Key Issues Identified

  • Missing values (NULL, blank)
  • Invalid values (negative Age, Cost)
  • Wrong dates
  • Duplicates
  • Inconsistent text formatting

3. Phase 1: Data Cleaning in SAS

Step-by-Step Cleaning

DATA costly_marriages_clean;

SET costly_marriages_raw;

/* Handle Missing Values */

IF Sponsor = "" OR Sponsor = "NULL" 

THEN Sponsor = "UNKNOWN";

/* Fix Negative Age */

IF Age < 0 THEN Age = ABS(Age);

/* Fix Cost */

IF Cost = "5M" THEN Cost_Num = 5000000;

ELSE IF Cost = "NULL" THEN Cost_Num = .;

ELSE Cost_Num = INPUT(Cost, BEST12.);

IF Cost_Num < 0 THEN Cost_Num = ABS(Cost_Num);

/* Standardize Country */

Country = UPCASE(TRIM(Country));

/* Standardize Status */

Status = UPCASE(Status);

/* Fix Date */

Marriage_dt = INPUT(Marriage_Date, ANYDTDTE.);

FORMAT Marriage_dt DATE9.;

RUN;

PROC PRINT DATA = costly_marriages_clean;

RUN;

OUTPUT:

ObsIDNameCountryCostGuestsAgeMarriage_DateStatusSponsorCost_NumMarriage_dt
11RoyalWeddingINDIA50000002000302023-02-28DONEKingCorp500000002FEB2023
22EliteUnionUSA5M1500252023-02-30DONEQueenLtd500000003FEB2023
33LuxuryTieUKNULL1800402022/12/15COMPLETEDUNKNOWN.01DEC2022
44GrandAffairINDIA7000000.3515-01-2023DONEKingCorp7000000.
55RoyalWeddingINDIA50000002000302023-02-28DONEKingCorp500000002FEB2023
66DiamondBondFRANCE-80000002500452023-03-10DONEEliteGroup800000001MAR2023
77GoldenCeremonyUSA90000003000502023-04-12 GoldInc900000001APR2023
88PlatinumUnionUK100000003500602023-05-20DONEUNKNOWN1000000002MAY2023
99SilverKnotIND85000002800552023-06-15DONESilverCorp850000001JUN2023
1010EliteUnionUSA5M1500252023-02-30DONEQueenLtd500000003FEB2023

/* Remove Duplicates */

PROC SORT DATA=costly_marriages_clean NODUPKEY;

BY ID Name;

RUN;

PROC PRINT DATA = costly_marriages_clean;

RUN;

OUTPUT:

ObsIDNameCountryCostGuestsAgeMarriage_DateStatusSponsorCost_NumMarriage_dt
11RoyalWeddingINDIA50000002000302023-02-28DONEKingCorp500000002FEB2023
22EliteUnionUSA5M1500252023-02-30DONEQueenLtd500000003FEB2023
33LuxuryTieUKNULL1800402022/12/15COMPLETEDUNKNOWN.01DEC2022
44GrandAffairINDIA7000000.3515-01-2023DONEKingCorp7000000.
55RoyalWeddingINDIA50000002000302023-02-28DONEKingCorp500000002FEB2023
66DiamondBondFRANCE-80000002500452023-03-10DONEEliteGroup800000001MAR2023
77GoldenCeremonyUSA90000003000502023-04-12 GoldInc900000001APR2023
88PlatinumUnionUK100000003500602023-05-20DONEUNKNOWN1000000002MAY2023
99SilverKnotIND85000002800552023-06-15DONESilverCorp850000001JUN2023
1010EliteUnionUSA5M1500252023-02-30DONEQueenLtd500000003FEB2023

Explanation

This SAS step systematically addresses all data inconsistencies. Missing values are replaced using conditional logic, ensuring no blank sponsor fields remain. Negative values are corrected using ABS(), critical for maintaining logical consistency (e.g., age cannot be negative). Cost values are standardized into numeric format, enabling further analysis. The UPCASE and TRIM functions enforce uniform text formatting, which is essential for grouping and reporting. The ANYDTDTE. informat intelligently parses mixed date formats. Finally, PROC SORT NODUPKEY removes duplicate records based on key identifiers, ensuring dataset uniqueness.

Key Points

  • Always convert character numbers to numeric early
  • Use ANYDTDTE. for messy date formats
  • Standardization prevents grouping errors

4. Phase 2: Data Cleaning in R

library(dplyr)

clean_data <- costly_marriages_raw %>%

  mutate(

    Sponsor = ifelse(is.na(Sponsor) | Sponsor == "", "UNKNOWN", Sponsor),

    Age = abs(Age),

    Cost_Num = case_when(Cost == "5M" ~ 5000000,

                         Cost == "NULL" ~ NA_real_,

                         TRUE ~ suppressWarnings(as.numeric(Cost))),

    Cost_Num = abs(Cost_Num),

    Country = toupper(trimws(Country)),

    Status = toupper(Status),

    Marriage_dt = as.Date(Marriage_Date,

                          tryFormats = c("%Y-%m-%d","%d-%m-%Y","%Y/%m/%d"))

  ) %>%

  distinct(ID, Name, .keep_all = TRUE)

OUTPUT:

 

ID

Name

Country

Cost

Guests

Age

Marriage_Date

Status

Sponsor

Cost_Num

Marriage_dt

1

1

RoyalWedding

INDIA

5000000

2000

30

28-02-2023

DONE

KingCorp

5.00E+06

28-02-2023

2

2

EliteUnion

USA

5M

1500

25

2023-02-30

DONE

QueenLtd

5.00E+06

NA

3

3

LuxuryTie

UK

NULL

1800

40

15-12-2022

COMPLETED

UNKNOWN

NA

NA

4

4

GrandAffair

INDIA

7000000

NA

35

15-01-2023

DONE

KingCorp

7.00E+06

0015-01-20

5

5

RoyalWedding

INDIA

5000000

2000

30

28-02-2023

DONE

KingCorp

5.00E+06

28-02-2023

6

6

DiamondBond

FRANCE

-8000000

2500

45

10-03-2023

DONE

EliteGroup

8.00E+06

10-03-2023

7

7

GoldenCeremony

USA

9000000

3000

50

12-04-2023

 

GoldInc

9.00E+06

12-04-2023

8

8

PlatinumUnion

UK

10000000

3500

60

20-05-2023

DONE

UNKNOWN

1.00E+07

20-05-2023

9

9

SilverKnot

IND

8500000

2800

55

15-06-2023

DONE

SilverCorp

8.50E+06

15-06-2023

10

10

EliteUnion

USA

5M

1500

25

2023-02-30

DONE

QueenLtd

5.00E+06

NA

Explanation

R leverages the dplyr package to create a streamlined pipeline for data cleaning. Missing values are handled using ifelse() and is.na(), ensuring completeness. The abs() function corrects negative values, while as.numeric() converts cost into a usable numeric format. Text standardization is achieved using toupper() and trimws(). Date parsing is handled flexibly using multiple format attempts via tryFormats. Finally, distinct() ensures duplicate removal. This pipeline-style transformation improves readability, reproducibility, and debugging efficiency.

Key Points

  • mutate() enables chained transformations
  • distinct() handles duplicates efficiently
  • Always validate date parsing

5. Phase 3: Additional SAS Enhancements

PROC MEANS DATA=costly_marriages_clean;

VAR Cost_Num Guests Age;

RUN;

OUTPUT:

The MEANS Procedure

VariableNMeanStd DevMinimumMaximum
Cost_Num
Guests
Age
9
9
10
6944444.44
2288.89
39.5000000
2006932.43
700.7932014
12.5720148
5000000.00
1500.00
25.0000000
10000000.00
3500.00
60.0000000

PROC FREQ DATA=costly_marriages_clean;

TABLES Country Status;

RUN;

OUTPUT:

The FREQ Procedure

CountryFrequencyPercentCumulative
Frequency
Cumulative
Percent
FRANCE110.00110.00
IND110.00220.00
INDIA330.00550.00
UK220.00770.00
USA330.0010100.00
StatusFrequencyPercentCumulative
Frequency
Cumulative
Percent
Frequency Missing = 1
COMPLETED111.11111.11
DONE888.899100.00

Explanation

After cleaning, validation and exploratory analysis are essential. PROC MEANS provides summary statistics, helping detect anomalies like unusually high costs or guest counts. PROC FREQ reveals distribution patterns in categorical variables such as Country and Status. These steps act as a secondary validation layer, ensuring that cleaning logic has not introduced inconsistencies. In clinical trials, similar procedures are used for SDTM validation checks before ADaM dataset derivation.

6. 20 Additional Data Cleaning Best Practices

  1. Always validate raw data before transformation
  2. Maintain audit trails for regulatory compliance
  3. Never overwrite raw datasets
  4. Use metadata-driven programming (CDISC)
  5. Apply range checks (Age > 0)
  6. Standardize units (currency, weight)
  7. Use controlled terminology
  8. Implement duplicate checks
  9. Validate date sequences
  10. Document all transformations
  11. Perform cross-dataset validation
  12. Use macros for repeatability
  13. Log all warnings/errors
  14. Validate derived variables
  15. Perform QC independently
  16. Use PROC COMPARE for validation
  17. Avoid hardcoding values
  18. Normalize categorical variables
  19. Validate against SAP
  20. Ensure reproducibility

7. Business Logic Behind Data Cleaning

Data cleaning is not just technical it’s strategic.

  • Missing values: Replacing Sponsor with "UNKNOWN" avoids null-related errors in reporting
  • Negative Age: Correcting ensures logical consistency
  • Cost normalization: Enables accurate aggregation and comparisons
  • Date correction: Critical for time-based analytics

In clinical trials:

  • Wrong patient age → incorrect subgroup analysis
  • Invalid dates → protocol deviations

8. 20 Key Insights (Sharp & Impactful)

  • Dirty data leads to wrong conclusions
  • Standardization ensures reproducibility
  • Missing values hide insights
  • Validation prevents regulatory rejection
  • Clean data builds trust
  • Dates drive timelines
  • Duplicates distort metrics
  • Text inconsistency breaks grouping
  • Automation reduces human error
  • QC is non-negotiable
  • SAS excels in structured pipelines
  • R excels in flexibility
  • Documentation is critical
  • Business logic drives cleaning
  • Errors compound quickly
  • Clean data accelerates decisions
  • Data integrity is everything
  • Consistency beats complexity
  • Validation saves projects
  • Clean data = credible analytics

9. SAS vs R – Comparison

Feature

SAS

R

Stability

High

Moderate

Flexibility

Moderate

High

Regulatory Use

Strong (CDISC)

Limited

Debugging

Easier logs

Requires skill

Performance

Optimized

Depends

10. Summary

The journey through the “Costly Marriages in the World” dataset highlights a fundamental truth in data analytics: even the most glamorous data can be deeply flawed beneath the surface. What initially appears to be high-value, insight-rich information quickly turns unreliable when plagued with inconsistencies such as missing values, invalid entries, duplicate records, and non-standard formats. This mirrors real-world scenarios in domains like clinical trials and financial analytics, where poor data quality can lead to misleading conclusions and regulatory risks.

Using SAS, we demonstrated a structured and industry-grade approach to data standardization leveraging functions like UPCASE, INPUT, ANYDTDTE., and procedures such as PROC SORT to systematically clean and validate data. SAS excels in controlled, reproducible environments, making it the preferred choice in regulated industries. In parallel, R showcased flexibility and efficiency through dplyr, enabling streamlined transformations using mutate(), case_when(), and distinct(). However, it also revealed subtle pitfalls like coercion warnings, reinforcing the need for careful function selection and validation.

Ultimately, data standardization is not just a technical step it is a strategic necessity. Clean, consistent data ensures accurate analysis, supports confident decision-making, and maintains compliance with industry standards. Whether working with billion-dollar weddings or clinical datasets, the principles remain the same: validate early, standardize rigorously, and document thoroughly. Mastering these practices distinguishes a competent programmer from a truly reliable data professional.

11. Conclusion

Data standardization is not optional it is foundational.

Whether you're analyzing billion-dollar weddings or clinical trial data, the principles remain the same:

  • Clean early
  • Validate continuously
  • Document thoroughly

A structured cleaning framework transforms chaos into clarity and that’s what separates average analysts from elite SAS programmers.

12. Interview Questions

Q1: How do you handle inconsistent date formats in SAS?
A: Use ANYDTDTE. informat.

Q2: How to remove duplicates?
A: PROC SORT NODUPKEY BY variables;

Q3: R equivalent of SAS missing handling?
A: is.na() and ifelse()

Q4: Debugging scenario: Negative ages in dataset?
A: Use ABS() and validate source data.

Q5: Why standardization is critical in SDTM?
A: Ensures regulatory compliance and reproducibility.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

About the Author:

SAS Learning Hub is a data analytics and SAS programming platform focused on clinical, financial, and real-world data analysis. The content is created by professionals with academic training in Pharmaceutics and hands-on experience in Base SAS, PROC SQL, Macros, SDTM, and ADaM, providing practical and industry-relevant SAS learning resources.


Disclaimer:

The datasets and analysis in this article are created for educational and demonstration purposes only. Here we learn about WEDDING DATA.


Our Mission:

This blog provides industry-focused SAS programming tutorials and analytics projects covering finance, healthcare, and technology.


This project is suitable for:

·  Students learning SAS

·  Data analysts building portfolios

·  Professionals preparing for SAS interviews

·  Bloggers writing about analytics and smart cities

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Follow Us On : 


 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--->Follow our blog for more SAS-based analytics projects and industry data models.

---> Support Us By Following Our Blog..

To deepen your understanding of SAS analytics, please refer to our other data science and industry-focused projects listed below:

1.Is there a strong relationship between employment rate and poverty reduction across states?A Complete Sas Study

2.Which mobile payment apps handle the highest number of transactions, and are they truly the most reliable?

3.Which namkeen products sell the most, and what does SAS data creation reveal about customer taste?A Sas Study

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

About Us | Contact Privacy Policy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

453.Global AI Trends Unlocked Through SCAN and SUBSTR Precision in SAS

441.Fixing Negative Data Errors Like A Pro Using SAS ABS Function

444.Turning Messy Raw Data Into Decision-Ready Gold With SAS Error Fixing Techniques